Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, OBATA Noboru wrote:
> > 
> > I have a bitter experience in analyzing a partial dump.  The
> > dump completely lacks the PTE pages of user processes and I had
> > to give up analysis then.  A partial dump has a risk of failure
> > in analysis.
> 
> Page tables of user processes are very often essential in a dump.
> Data pages of user processes are almost always just a waste of
> space and time in a dump.  Please don't judge against partial
> dumps on the basis of one that was badly selected.

We've had hard-to-reproduce problems out in the field where being able
to find the data pages of the user process was critical to figuring
out what the heck was going on.  So I wouldn't be quite so eager to
dismiss the need for user pages.  There are times when they come in
quite handy....

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux