Re: [PATCH 1/1] indirect function calls elimination in IO scheduler

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 17:08 +0400, Ananiev, Leonid I wrote:
> >From Leonid Ananiev
> 
>       Fully modular io schedulers and enables online switching between
> them was introduced in Linux 2.6.10 but as a result percentage of CPU
> using by kernel was increased and performance degradation is marked on
> Itanium. A cause of degradation is in more steps for indirect IO
> scheduler type specific function calls.
>       The patch eliminates 45 indirect function calls in 16 elevator
> functions. 

does it really reduce those function calls? I thought it only reduced a
few pointers to be followed, but not the actual indirect function calls!



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] indirect function calls elimination in IO scheduler
    • From: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] more HPET fixes and enhancements
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] more HPET fixes and enhancements
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/1] indirect function calls elimination in IO scheduler
• Next by thread: RE: [PATCH 1/1] indirect function calls elimination in IO scheduler
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]