* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > + /* > > > + * There's a good chance that the loop will exit in the > > > + * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state. > > > + */ > > > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > > > > no need to comment the obvious. > > So, should I resend the patch without the comment? i guess so. OTOH, if it was so obvious, why did it stay unfixed for so long ;-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- References:
- scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Mark Knecht <[email protected]>
- Re: scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- Prev by Date: tty line discipline
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- Index(es):
 |