On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:51:47AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > So, should I resend the patch without the comment? yes, please ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- References:
- scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Mark Knecht <[email protected]>
- Re: scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- scsi_eh / 1394 bug - -rt7
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- Next by Date: Re: spec file
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error thread exits in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
- Index(es):
 |