On Monday 17 October 2005 07:44, Felix Oxley wrote:
> On Monday 17 October 2005 08:33, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Monday 17 October 2005 06:37, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > Actually if this is a patch against 2.6, between ramfs (including
> > > > initramfs) and the ability to loopback mount files, I personally
> > > > consider ramdisks semi-obsolete. (This might be _why_ it says most
> > > > normal users won't need them.)
>
> You are right in all you say.
> However, my system uses initrd and I thought that a help message warning
> newbies that these options are required if inrd is used, would be useful.
> Since I removed it and was uanble to boot :-)
Understandable concern.
> Do you think the slimmed down patch below is appropriate, or shall I just
> drop the subject?
Well, it's better. The first part's a clear correction.
When you note that some systems need it to build, I'd mention that newer
systems should probably be using initramfs. Other than that, no objection.
Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
