On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Dipankar Sarma a écrit :
> >On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:16:25AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
>
> <lazy_mode=ON>
> Do we really need a TIF_RCUUPDATE flag, or could we just ask for a resched ?
> </lazy_mode>
I think the theory was that we have to process the callbacks,
not just force the grace period by setting need_resched.
That is what TIF_RCUUPDATE indicates - rcus to process.
> This patch only take care of call_rcu(), I'm unsure of what can be done
> inside call_rcu_bh()
>
> The two stress program dont hit OOM anymore with this patch applied (even
> with maxbatch=10)
Hmm.. I am supprised that maxbatch=10 still allowed you keep up
with a continuously queueing cpu. OK, I will look at this.
Thanks
Dipankar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
