On Monday 17 October 2005 20:01, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-10-17 at 18:41 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > IMHO the right fix is to put that atomic scrub thingy into another
> > include file. It seems to cause major additional include dependencies and
> > is only used in a single file right now.
>
> Every file I looked at (I've not looked at NTFS) included types.h if it
> included atomic.h but sometimes directly or indirectly after atomic.h
> rather than before.
>
> I was thinking of just writing a tool to find the other cases and then
> fix those I can.
I think it is far better you do it in a different macro in a different file
without any nasty dependencies. What you're trying to do has nothing
to do with atomic_t anyways. It is just abuse of atomic.h
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
