On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:40:56PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 17 October 2005 17:27, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > ...
> > Argh. Which one should I pick? The NODE(0) one looks simpler, but is it
> > sufficient for now in practice (with the real one going into 2.6.14+)?
> >
> > Linus
>
> First this problem is definitely not critical. AFAIK it only happens on
> scalex's unreleased machines. Intel NUMA x86 machines are really rare
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No they are not. IBM X460s are generally available machines and the bug
affects those boxes. How can there be a major kernel release which is known
to have breakage??
Maybe someone with access to ia64 NUMA boxen can check if the NODE(0)
solution works (and does not break anything) on ia64? Chrisoph, can you help?
Thanks,
Kiran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
