Re: [PATCH] libata: fix broken Kconfig setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:

CONFIG_SCSI_SATA does two things:
* Enables/disables the display of the SATA driver menu.
* Enables/disables the compiled-in PCI quirk.

Both of these are boolean, and have absolutely nothing to do with modules.


You ignore the biggest thing it does:
 - it is the depends-on for the actual low-level drivers

That dependency for each driver exists solely for menu display purposes. There is no code dependency.


IOW, the _biggest_ reason for it existing at all is in fact _not_ a boolean. It very much is a tristate. When it's "m" the SATA driver menu _should_ show.

The only operational difference between CONFIG_SCSI_SATA=y and CONFIG_SCSI_SATA=m is that CONFIG_SCSI_SATA=m restricts the drivers from being compiled in -- a silly and needless restriction.

The elimination of 'y' as an option should propagate from CONFIG_SCSI.


Also, as already mentioned, that compiled-in PCI quirk is _wrong_. The fact that somebody asked for SCSI_SATA should not change Intel settings. Maybe somebody hass a separate SATA card, and has enabled support for _that_, but wants the on-board thing to work with legacy drivers? The way he'd have done that is to enable SCSI_SATA, but _not_ enable SCSI_ATA_PIIX.

Agreed this is a _theoretical_ problem.

Never heard of this being an issue in the real world, because the IDE driver locks up on a lot of the Intel hardware in question. That was one of the original reason for the split PATA/SATA driver configuration, for this wonky combined mode.


Btw, if you want to really hide things (and not just gray them out) I think you should do a

	menu "SATA low-level drivers"
		depends on SCSI_SATA != n

	..

	endmenu

around the SATA drivers.

No preference whether its hidden or greyed out.

CONFIG_SCSI_SATA is just a switch to enable listing a set of drivers, just like CONFIG_NET_PCI (which I note is a bool), CONFIG_NET_ISA (a bool), ...


Because it's fundamental a boolean, and has -zero- to do with modules.
Encouraging people to think otherwise will just lead to more confusion.


I disagree. It is no more fundamentally boolean than anything else that controls modules. It's a tristate, because it chooses between the low-level drivers being tristate.

I also think that the _only_ thing your ugly patch fixes was totally wrong for wholly other reasons anyway. If that quirk is needed, it really looks like it should be

	#if defined(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PIIX) || defined(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PIIX_MODULE)
	..
	#endif

If IDE is compiled in, IDE SATA option is not enabled, and ata_piix or ahci are used.

Do we really want to do

	#if defined (CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC) &&
	       !defined(CONFIG_IDE_BLK_DEV_SATA) &&
	    (
	       defined(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PIIX) ||
	       defined(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PIIX_MODULE) ||
	       defined(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_AHCI ||
	       defined(CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_AHCI_MODULE)
	    )

?

At that point it seems easier to solve at the Kconfig level, perhaps defining CONFIG_SATA_INTEL_COMBINED at the end. And then with the quirk issue out of the way, CONFIG_SCSI_SATA becomes purely a boolean enable/disable-this-menu switch.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux