Re: [PATCH] highest_possible_processor_id() has to be a macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David S. Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> So ugly...
> 
> But, it's the best fix for now.
> 
> Longer term we might want to make an asm/cpumask.h that can
> help allow the platforms to cleanly say "well, mask X is
> equivalent to Y, so only instantiate X and define Y to X"
> which is all that these two platforms are trying to accomplish.

The other thing you could is have an inline function called
highest_processor_id (or perhaps last_cpu) that calculates the
biggest CPU ID for any map and then define highest_possible_processor_id
as a macro that just calls the function with the right arguments.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux