Jesper Juhl [Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 10:22:22PM +0200]: > On 10/15/05, Nico Schottelius <[email protected]> wrote: > [snip] > > Could we somehow debug this differently or do I have to install > > 2.6.13.2 and 2.6.13.1, too? It would take simply hours until it is > > finished here. > > > > If you have another, faster, machine available you could build the > kernel(s) on that one. Actually, one of my fastest machines is this one: bruehe2# cat /proc/cpuinfo [...] model name : Pentium III (Katmai) cpu MHz : 551.280 [...] And one, which has a not-so-good connection to me. > You don't have to build a kernel on the same > machine that is later supposed to run it. That's clear :-) > Also, if you have more than one machine (even if they are not > especially fast) then you can use distcc (http://distcc.samba.org/) to > distribute the build over multiple machines which can speed up a build > a great deal. distcc will fail here, because of different gccs and different distributions (ever tried to use gentoo and distcc in the same distcc-network? It's a real pain). Thanks for the hints anyway, Nico -- Latest project: cconfig (http://nico.schotteli.us/papers/linux/cconfig/) Open Source nutures open minds and free, creative developers.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <[email protected]>
- Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- From: Paolo Ornati <[email protected]>
- Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- References:
- Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- From: Nico Schottelius <[email protected]>
- Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- From: Christian Kujau <[email protected]>
- Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- From: Nico Schottelius <[email protected]>
- Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- From: Nico Schottelius <[email protected]>
- Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- Prev by Date: Re: ohci1394 unhandled interrupts bug in 2.6.14-rc2
- Next by Date: Re: new PCI quirk for Toshiba Satellite?
- Previous by thread: Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- Next by thread: Re: Some problems with 2.6.13.4
- Index(es):