Re: interruptible_sleep_on, interrupts and device drivers

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 12:29 +0200, Gabriele Brugnoni wrote:
> > 		save_flags(flags); cli();
> 
> this is broken code; cli() cannot and should not be used. (and isn't
> even available on SMP kernels anymore)
> 
> > 		if( !rs.txdone ) {
> > 			if( arg < 0 ) arg = rs.ttimeout;
> > 			if( arg > 0 )
> > 				interruptible_sleep_on_timeout ( &rs.txwait, arg );
> > 			else
> > 				interruptible_sleep_on ( &rs.txwait );
> > 		}
> > 		restore_flags(flags);
> 
> and this is missing a sti()

Err, no, that's wrong.  sti() unconditionally enables interrupts - if
an sti() was placed here, it's pointless using save_flags() (which
saves the old interrupt enable state) and restore_flags() (which
restores the interrupt enable state).

Also remember that interruptible_sleep_* is only safe on UP machines
provided it's called with interrupts disabled.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/