On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:13:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:25:18PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
>> > This seems to be -stable material since it's a clear cut bug with bad
>> > consequences.
>> >
>> > Chris Wright - is the below patch acceptable for -stable?
> Also, I don't think this should go into -stable, as there are no
> high-speed HID devices available right now, so it really isn't affecting
> anyone :)
No, that's no correct. There are such devices:
Newer KVM-over-IP appliances, like the Avocent's DSR2030 emulates
keyboard, mouse and a mass storage device over USB. I've tested this
specific device with linux and the USB transfers are Highspeed and the
USB device has one interface which is HID. So there are Highspeed USB
devices out there.
With all respect, but I don't really understand why this is important.
The linux kernel clearly violates the USB specification. The calculation of
the real polling interval for interrupt endpoints is
i = 2^(bInterval-1) (according to USB 2.0 spec, chapter 9.6.6) and _not_
i = 2^((2^(bInterval-1))-1) as it is calculated in linux.
This is clearly a bug in linux and should be fixed.
Changing this has _no_ impact on other devices than Highspeed HID devices
and only this patch allows them to work. And there are such devices. At
least Avocent's DSR2030.
Best regards,
Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
