Re: [PATCH] Use of getblk differs between locations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >>- the write of these data waits until the dialog window is 
> >>displayed,
> >>user inserts the device and clicks 'OK'
> >
> >No, it's not, and deadlock is definitely possible. However, if we're 
> >at
> >the point where memory is tight enough that it's an issue, the timer 
> >can
> >expire and all the pending i/o is dropped just as it would be without
> >the multipath code enabled.
> >
> >I'm not saying it's a solution ready for production, just a good
> >starting point.
> 
> But discarding data sometimes on USB unplug is even worse than 
> discarding data always --- users will by experimenting learn that 

*Good starting point*.

Anyway, one solution would be to simply mlockall() on that
replugitd and/or make dirty data hdd based
(not ram based) and/or
restricting dirty buffers to 10MB for removable media.

				Pavel
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux