* Esben Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I set up rtc_wakeup and got a jitter up 1.6ms!
> It came when I cd'en into a nfs-mount and typed ls.
> ls-11239 0Dn.. 4us : profile_hit (__schedule)
> ls-11239 0Dn.1 4us : sched_clock (__schedule)
> ls-11239 0Dn.1 5us : check_tsc_unstable (sched_clock)
> ls-11239 0Dn.1 5us : tsc_read_c3_time (sched_clock)
> IRQ 8-775 0D..2 6us : __switch_to (__schedule)
> IRQ 8-775 0D..2 7us!: __schedule <ls-11239> (75 0)
> IRQ 8-775 0...1 1594us : trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule)
> IRQ 8-775 0D..2 1594us : trace_stop_sched_switched <IRQ 8-775> (0 0)
> IRQ 8-775 0D..2 1595us : trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule)
ouch! This very much looks like a hardware induced latency, because the
codepath from those two __schedule points is extremely short and there
is no loop there. Have you tested this particular box before too? If
not, can you reproduce this latency with older versions of -rt too on
the same box, or is this completely new? Occasionally there are boxes
that show clear signs of hardware latencies - there's little the kernel
can do about those.
Wild shot in the dark: are there any power-saving modes enabled on the
box? Another shot in the dark: can you trigger these latencies if the
networking card is ifconfig down-ed? I.e. perhaps it's related to DMA
done by the networking device. Playing with BIOS settings / DMA/PCI
priorities might help reduce DMA related latencies ...
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]