Re: [PATCH] drivers/base - fix sparse warnings

[Ben Dooks <ben@fluff.org.uk>]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:10:15AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > 
> > The patch does not solve all the sparse errors generated,
> > but reduces the count significantly.
> 
> Well, you should also then remove the _bad_ declarations.

Sorry, I do not follow you, can you clarify this for me.
My patch did not generate any more errors, just removed the ones
that where easy to see a solution too.
 
> For example, attribute_container_init() right now is defined in 
> attribute_container.c, but then it's _declared_ (with no checking) where 
> it's used in init.c. 
> 
> The sparse warnign is appropriate: it was not declared where that 
> declaration is actually visible to the definition, so the code basically 
> isn't type-safe at all (since there's nothing that enforces the 
> declaration actually matching the definition).
> 
> You made the declaration properly visible, but you should also remove the 
> bogus declaration. A declaration that isn't visible to the definition is 
> always bad - since in the absense of a compiler with global visibility it 
> may or may not actually match what it supposedly declares.
> 
> I wonder if I should make sparse warn about multiple declarations..

I pulled the old declerations out of drivers/base/init.c ? I'm sure
the patch shows that?

-- 
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/