2005/10/12, Chris Wright <[email protected]>:
> * Grzegorz Nosek ([email protected]) wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6/fs/read_write.c~ 2005-10-06 21:35:03.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6/fs/read_write.c 2005-10-05 19:14:04.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@
> > current->syscr++;
> > current->syscw++;
> >
> > - if (*ppos > max)
> > + if (ppos && *ppos > max)
> > retval = -EOVERFLOW;
>
> This doesn't make sense. ppos must not be NULL.
>
> Code looks like this:
>
> if (!ppos)
> ppos = &in_file->f_pos;
> ...
> pos = *ppos;
> ...
> if (*ppos > max)
>
> So it can't be NULL, and if somehow it were, the oops would've already
> happened.
>
Yeah, I know. It turned out to be a 3rd-party patch (vserver
probably). My read_write.c looks very different and somehow I
overlooked that while checking with vanilla 2.6.13.3. Sorry for the
confusion.
Regards,
Greg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]