Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005

On Wednesday 12 October 2005 12:05, jerome lacoste wrote:
>
> But in the LZF case, there's 100 M more memory in the cache. That
> certainly has some I/O perf. impact, right?
>

mm.. well spotted.
It would be better if both measurements were taken from the same starting 
point, e.g. immediately after boot.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005
    • From: Felix Oxley <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005
    • From: jerome lacoste <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: bug in handling of highspeed usb HID devices
• Next by Date: Re: blocking file lock functions (lockf,flock,fcntl) do not return after timer signal
• Previous by thread: Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005
• Next by thread: Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]