Re: [PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: Demand fault handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure this does fully deal with truncation, I'm afraid - it
> will deal with a truncation well before the fault, but not a
> concurrent truncate().  We'll need the truncate_count/retry logic from
> do_no_page, I think.  Andi/Hugh, can you confirm that's correct?

Very likely you're right, but I already explained to Adam privately
that I won't get to look at all this before tomorrow - sorry.

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux