OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the implementation within fs-writeback.c.Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?
Please let me confirm. Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c, even it would write data. Is it correct? -- Hiroyuki Machida [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch to remove list member from struct tcx_par in drivers/video/tcx.c
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 20/22] PCI Error Recovery: e100 network device driver
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
- Index(es):
 |