Alex Riesen wrote:
On 10/6/05, Madhu K.S. <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
In many application we use select() system call for delay.
example:
select(0,NULL,NULL,NULL,&t1);
select() for delay is very inefficient. I modified sys_select() code for
Why don't you just use nanosleep(2) (or usleep)?
I think the answers here are (a) because there's an existing code base,
and (b) as long as the functionality is required it might as well be
provided optimally. If tou're going to do something at all, do it right.
--
-bill davidsen ([email protected])
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
