H. Peter Anvin wrote:
You have a funny way of assigning people action items.
I am sorry... But... You are the author of this document, right?
THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL
----------------------------
H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Last update 2002-01-01
Do you want me yo suggest the update? I will be glad!
I don't really understand (yet) how you guys working... I am
learning... So please help me understand.
Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- References:
- Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Prev by Date: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_die'
- Next by Date: Re: Direct Rendering drivers for ATI X300 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Index(es):
 |