On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:26:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Sébastien Bernard <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:28:31 +0200
>
> > Can one explain me why this patch works on other archs, and oops on the
> > sparc64 smp ?
> > Can one explain why I'm the only one to have this problem ?
>
> On your Ultra60 the two physical cpus are numbered "0" and "2".
>
Thanks for the information.
Indeed they are. Does the patch assume that cpus are numbered in a
row ?
Now, I reverted the patch for ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c and ebtables.c.
Everything is working ok (11h uptime).
Is this problem specific to the Ultra 60 or sparc arch ?
Will a proper fix be issued for our machines ?
Seb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
