On Oct 8, 2005, at 3:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:22:20PM -0700, david singleton wrote:
On Oct 8, 2005, at 3:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:47:23PM -0700, david singleton wrote:
Ingo,
here's a patch for the robust futex changes that match the
glibc/nptl changes
for robust futexes. The kernel and glibc now both have robustness
and
priority inheritance independent.
Are you aware of the futex FUTEX_WAKE_OP addition from over a month
ago?
Futex command 5 is already taken, so you can't use it for the robust
futex commands.
Yes. I merged the robust ops a while back to be compatible with
WAKE_OP.
Currently, 2.6.14-rc3-rt13, the ops are defined thusly:
#define FUTEX_WAIT 0
#define FUTEX_WAKE 1
#define FUTEX_FD 2
#define FUTEX_REQUEUE 3
#define FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE 4
#define FUTEX_WAKE_OP 5
#define FUTEX_WAIT_ROBUST 6
#define FUTEX_WAKE_ROBUST 7
#define FUTEX_REGISTER 8
#define FUTEX_DEREGISTER 9
#define FUTEX_RECOVER 10
That's ok.
I was judging by the glibc patch you posted this Friday:
Sorry, that was against an old tree. The patch today was against
2.6.14-rc3-rt13.
I've done that twice now. I have to back up to the bleeding edge.
David
+#define FUTEX_WAIT_ROBUST 5
+#define FUTEX_WAKE_ROBUST 6
+#define FUTEX_REGISTER 7
+#define FUTEX_DEREGISTER 8
+#define FUTEX_RECOVER 9
Jakub
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
