Re: [stable] Re: [patch 4/7] sysfs: Signedness problem

* Dave Jones ([email protected]) wrote:
> For those scratching their heads, the subject line came
> about as a result of my following up an older issue.
> This has nothing to do with signedness of course :-)

Yes, you're right.  That's my fault for not editing the patch better
before adding it to the queue.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 4/7] sysfs: Signedness problem
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 4/7] sysfs: Signedness problem
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [stable] Re: [patch 4/7] sysfs: Signedness problem
• Next by Date: Re: [stable] Re: [patch 4/7] sysfs: Signedness problem
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable] Re: [patch 4/7] sysfs: Signedness problem
• Next by thread: [patch 6/7] Avoid 'names_cache' memory leak with CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]