Re: [2.6] binfmt_elf bug (exposed by klibc).

PaweÅ? Sikora <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia piÄ?tek, 7 paÅºdziernika 2005 15:46, Horst von Brand napisaÅ?:

[...]

> > binutils-2.16.91.0.2-4 doesn't. It looks like you are using broken tools.

> I didn't say that is (or not) a binutils bug.
> I'm only saying that kernel is killng a valid micro application.

If binutils generates an invalid executable, it is not a valid application.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6] binfmt_elf bug (exposed by klibc).
  - From: Paweł Sikora <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [2.6] binfmt_elf bug (exposed by klibc).
  - From: Paweł Sikora <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
Next by Date: Re: [2.6] binfmt_elf bug (exposed by klibc).
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6] binfmt_elf bug (exposed by klibc).
Next by thread: Re: [2.6] binfmt_elf bug (exposed by klibc).
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]