Re: [PATCH] vm - swap_prefetch-15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:26, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Makes sense but it is only used in the CONFIG_SWAP_PREFETCH case so it
> > would end up as a static inline in swap.h to avoid ending being #ifdefed
> > in page_alloc.c. Do you think that's preferable to having it in
> > swap_prefetch.c ?
>
> But then you would still have to open up buffered_rmqueue() and
> zone_statistics() to everyone, no? 

bah of course..  /me slaps forehead

> How about you implement a new gfp flag 
> __GFP_NEVER_RECLAIM similar to __GFP_NORECLAIM instead so you don't have
> to duplicate __page_alloc()?

That will end up being far more intrusive than this version and __alloc_pages 
would need more tests that affect every call to __alloc_pages which seems 
much more expensive to me than exporting buffered_rmqueue and 
zone_statistics, and the modified __alloc_pages will still be a much more 
complicated function than prefetch_get_page. 

Thanks,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux