Re: [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:14:33PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > Here's a patch to illustrate what I mean.
> 
> Nice, _very_ nice. It broke compilation at two places... Here are fixes.

Thanks for testing Pavel.  I've added this to the patch.  Obviously
I'll hold off the patch until 2.6.14 has happened.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework
    • From: Mark Underwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.13.3 Memory leak, names_cache
• Next by Date: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]