Re: [RFC] atomic create+open

to den 06.10.2005 Klokka 22:17 (+0200) skreiv Miklos Szeredi:
> I just think that filesystem code should _never_ need to care about
> mounts.  If you want to do the lookup+open, you somehow will have to
> deal with mounts, which is ugly.

You appear to think that atomic lookup+open is a question of choice. It
is not.

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
Next by Date: 2.4.27 ata_piix support
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] atomic create+open
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]