On Friday 23 September 2005 17:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:46:38PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > The fix is easy, IMHO, and not even urgent. It suffices to move
> > PTRACE_SYSEMU def from <linux/ptrace.h> to <asm-i386/ptrace.h>, and we
> > didn't do that yet for laziness only. There's no architecture that I know
> > of, apart i386, which implements SYSEMU (except maybe s390, but that
> > isn't public).
> Please either renumber it to something above 0x4200,
> or make it i386
> private.
I'm going to do this.
> If you intend for other architectures to implement it in the
> future, renumbering it would be better.
Possibly yes, sooner or later ports will emerge, but this is already in
production, so I have ABI issues.
For new archs, I'll use the right range.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
