Re: [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 08:02:34PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> 
> Since this is obsolete infrastructure which is no longer necessary,
> we can remove it.  Here's an (untested) patch to do exactly that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework
    • From: Mark Underwood <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/12] HPPFS: add dentry_ops->d_revalidate
• Next by Date: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Get rid of the obsolete tri-level suspend/resume callbacks (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] simple SPI framework)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]