Re: select(0,NULL,NULL,NULL,&t1) used for delay

[Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>]

On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 09:26 -0600, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> Alex Riesen wrote:
> 
> > Why don't you just use nanosleep(2) (or usleep)?
> 
> I can think of one main reason...existing code.  Also, nanosleep() 

And it's cooler to hack the kernel than to create and use a
portable_sleep() function and use it.

> rounds up excessively in many kernel versions, so that a request to 
> sleep for less than 1 tick ends up sleeping for 2 ticks.
                                                  ^^^^^^^

> The select() man page explicitly mentions this usage;
> 
> "Some code calls select with all three sets empty, n zero, and a 
> non-null timeout as a fairly portable way to sleep with subsecond 
                                                          ^^^^^^^^^
> precision."
  ^^^^^^^^^

You do realize that "subsecond precision" is probably meant as
improvement to sleep(3) and surely not to nanosleep(2)?

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/