Andi Kleen a écrit :
On Thursday 06 October 2005 15:50, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Maybe we should reflect this in Kconfig ?
config NR_CPUS
range 2 128
Or use a plain int for spinlock, instead of a signed char.
Hmm? 2.6 already uses int as far as I can see.
Not in public 2.6 at least.
ffffffff8030be10 <_spin_lock>:
ffffffff8030be10: 55 push %rbp
ffffffff8030be11: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
ffffffff8030be14: f0 fe 0f lock decb (%rdi)
ffffffff8030be17: 0f 88 d1 02 00 00 js <.text.lock.spinlock>
ffffffff8030be1d: c9 leaveq
ffffffff8030be1e: c3 retq
Sorry Andi, I only trust assembly :)
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
