Re: [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file

[Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@colitti.com>]

Pavel Machek wrote:
> "Cool, so you have done 100% of work and now it is stable, fast and
> tested. You only need to do 200% more work to get it merged".
>
> Merging into kernel is not easy, sorry.

Of course. I was just saying that it might be better for users if you, 
Nigel and the other parties involved collaborated on getting suspend2 
merged instead of working on 2 or 3 separate implementations. My gut 
feeling is that it would be quicker to do that than to nail the sucky 
low-level bugs that are bound to come up when developing the new uswsusp 
framework.

And now, since there's nothing I can actually do to help this - you 
can't learn to be a kernel hacker in two weeks - I'll shut up. But I 
just wanted to remind everyone involved that from a user's perspective, 
it would be great if suspend2 were merged.

It works, it's fast, it's stable, and it does what users want. That's a 
strong combination. It would be really good if you could work together 
to merge it.


Cheers,
Lorenzo

--
http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/