On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:27:15 -0700 Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com> wrote: > There would be different rights to eack link. Well, color me confused. You appear to be saying that the permission on a file differ depending on which link you are accessing it by. Furthermore, your stance seems to imply that linking to a file grants either write permission or ownership on the new link. So, under this permission model, I could link to /etc/passwd in my home directory, edit the link to change my UID to zero, then relogin to the system as an administrator. Not that I would need to, of course, because any user who owns/could write to a directory would be able to alter any file on the entire system. I know they're called "permission" models, but that seems *extremely* permissive... -- -Julian Blake Kongslie <jblake@omgwallhack.org>
Attachment:
pgpkYuDKnoLTz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Bas Westerbaan <bas.westerbaan@gmail.com>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- References:
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@7eggert.dyndns.org>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- Prev by Date: PAE causing failure to run various executables.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Free swap suspend from depending upon PageReserved.
- Previous by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- Next by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- Index(es):
![]() |