Hi,
>Not complex enough so that a network boot protocol can't fit on a BIOS
>chip, believe me.
So _why_ the freebox act _differently_ in the boot process when there is
a firmware update ?
Just for the fun ?
> he only wrong assumptions that I see here are yours.
I provide facts and arguments, you provide nothing.
>I don't understand why you cannot accept that the Freebox is part of the
>Free network infrastructure and that you are not using directly the OS
>but only the service that they provide.
So what about _my_ wifi pcmcia card ?
What about the people who had to paid 400 euros and receive a letter
from free telling them that according to CGV there are the onwer of the
freebox (ok this one need some checks).
Again in my first post I provide facts for this (with links), you provide
nothing than replying always the same things without arguments against
mine.
Please take my first post and reply to point A, B, C with arguments.
>'Got it, now ?
No, because you didn't answer to my questions...
Pierre
Please let's continue on legal gpl-violations.org ML.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
