Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance

On Tuesday 04 October 2005 19:01, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > In a sense it's even getting worse: For example us losing the CONFIG
> > option to disable local conntrack (Patrick has disabled it some time ago
> > without even a comment why he did it) has a really bad impact in some
> > cases.
>
> It was necessary to correctly handle locally generated ICMP errors.

Well you most likely wrecked local performance then when it's enabled.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
    • From: Harald Welte <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
    • From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH] identify raid rcu-protected pointer
• Next by Date: RE: 2.6.13.2 aacraid regression
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]