Re: freebox possible GPL violation

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> that's not enough to satisfy the GPL conditions. 

It is.

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case
I'm just a bit more right than I usually am.
  -- Linus Torvalds

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: freebox possible GPL violation
    • From: Vincent Hanquez <[email protected]>
  • Re: freebox possible GPL violation
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: freebox possible GPL violation
    • From: Pierre Michon <[email protected]>
  • Re: freebox possible GPL violation
    • From: Emmanuel Fleury <[email protected]>
  • Re: freebox possible GPL violation
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: freebox possible GPL violation
    • From: Emmanuel Fleury <[email protected]>
  • Re: freebox possible GPL violation
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] TIMERS: add missing compensation for HZ == 250.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Keys: Export user-defined keyring operations
• Previous by thread: Re: freebox possible GPL violation
• Next by thread: Re: freebox possible GPL violation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]