Re: freebox possible GPL violation

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> that's not enough to satisfy the GPL conditions. 

It is.

Regards
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case
I'm just a bit more right than I usually am.
  -- Linus Torvalds

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: freebox possible GPL violation
  - From: Vincent Hanquez <vincent@snarc.org>
- Re: freebox possible GPL violation
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>

References:
- Re: freebox possible GPL violation
  - From: Pierre Michon <pierre@no-spam.org>
- Re: freebox possible GPL violation
  - From: Emmanuel Fleury <fleury@cs.aau.dk>
- Re: freebox possible GPL violation
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: freebox possible GPL violation
  - From: Emmanuel Fleury <fleury@cs.aau.dk>
- Re: freebox possible GPL violation
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] TIMERS: add missing compensation for HZ == 250.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Keys: Export user-defined keyring operations
Previous by thread: Re: freebox possible GPL violation
Next by thread: Re: freebox possible GPL violation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]