On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 12:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 20:46 +0530, Dinakar Guniguntala wrote:
> > >
> > > I get a lot of these with -rt7 (One every minute)
> > >
> > > BUG: auditd:3596, possible softlockup detected on CPU#3!
> > > [<c0144c48>] softlockup_detected+0x39/0x46 (8)
> > > [<c0144d26>] softlockup_tick+0xd1/0xd3 (20)
> > > [<c0111252>] smp_apic_timer_ipi_interrupt+0x4d/0x56 (24)
> > > [<c010396c>] apic_timer_ipi_interrupt+0x1c/0x24 (12)
> > > [<c0102e7f>] sysenter_past_esp+0x24/0x75 (44)
> >
>
> Daniel,
>
> If it works then sure. That would also show that the offending CPU is not
> taking any normal interrupts (non-ipi).
Could we move that check into update_process_times() , and do the if
statement off user_tick ? Cause otherwise the touch call will have to be
copied to bunch more functions ..
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
