Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:23:01AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> OK, that sort of confirms the theory that there's a bad interaction at
> u320.  What I'll try to do is to implement the bios parameter routines
> for the aic79xx and you can set it to u160 in the bios.  Since I can't
> test this, would you be a guinea pig when I come up with it?

No problem.

  OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
  • Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
  • Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
• Next by Date: Subject: [PATCH] i386 io_apic.c: Memorize at bootup where the i8259 is connected
• Previous by thread: Re: Infinite interrupt loop, INTSTAT = 0
• Next by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/sunrpc/: possible cleanups
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]