Re: [RFC][PATCH][Fix] swsusp: Yet another attempt to fix Bug #4959

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, 2 of October 2005 12:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 1 of October 2005 21:45, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 October 2005 18:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > This function allocates twice as much memory as needed for the direct
> > > mapping page tables and assigns the second half of it to the resume page
> > > tables.  This area is later marked with PG_nosave by swsusp, so that it is
> > > not overwritten during resume.
> > >
> > I prefered it when the additional page tables were allocated only on demand.
> 
> Me too.  Let's get back to that patch, then. :-)
> 
> Comments etc. will be appreciated.

I haven't got any comments since I posted it on Saturday, so I gather there are
no objections.  Or are there any?

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux