Luben Tuikov wrote:
As opposed to those vendors saying: We _really_ need 64 bit LUNS
and it would be really nice to get rid of HCIL, etc, etc.
Everybody agrees with this 100%
Note that James submitted a sdev_printk() patch in the past few days,
which assists in removing HCIL from the SCSI core.
IMO, 64 bit LUNs and no HCIL is more important than "transport
attributes" and should've _preceded_ them.
Agreed. But that's a lot of work, and I doubt people want to delay SAS
further to wait for complete HCIL elimination.
The fact that you're trying to umbrella them together, doesn't
make it _technologically_ correct.
It's muddled together, yes. That doesn't make it any less correct.
It's just not a clean, immediate separation. Its a separation that
takes time.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
