Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>]

Luben Tuikov wrote:
> As opposed to those vendors saying: We _really_ need 64 bit LUNS
> and it would be really nice to get rid of HCIL, etc, etc.
Everybody agrees with this 100%

Note that James submitted a sdev_printk() patch in the past few days, 
which assists in removing HCIL from the SCSI core.

> IMO, 64 bit LUNs and no HCIL is more important than "transport
> attributes" and should've _preceded_ them.
Agreed.  But that's a lot of work, and I doubt people want to delay SAS 
further to wait for complete HCIL elimination.

> The fact that you're trying to umbrella them together, doesn't
> make it _technologically_ correct.
It's muddled together, yes.  That doesn't make it any less correct. 
It's just not a clean, immediate separation.  Its a separation that 
takes time.
	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/