Re: [PATCH] Document patch subject line better

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:
>
> Improve explanation of the Subject line fields in
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches Canonical Patch Format.

Ironically, the patch you sent doesn't adhere to the very documentation 
you are updating ;)

Hint: missing "---".

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Document patch subject line better
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Document patch subject line better
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/07][RFC] i386: NUMA emulation
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document patch subject line better
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document patch subject line better
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]