Bernard Blackham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
>> Is there any kernel api that adding would make cryopid more
>> dependable/cleaner?
>
> Currently a fair bit of information is obtained by injecting code
> into the process's memory space, executing it, and reaping out the
> results (eg, termcaps, file offsets, fcntl states, locks, signal
> actions, etc). Can't think of ways to make it cleaner off the top
> of my head, but I'm open to ideas.
What about using an uml wrapper + vncserver? This would give you a complete
virtual environment, and if you can make uml suspend-to-disk, you've got
most of it. (I admit I never tried uml, so this is just a guess.)
Off cause the network connections will still time out etc etc, but that's
nothing you can do about that.
Be fvzcyl hfr bcren, juvpu pna fnsr vg'f bja fgngr.
--
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
