Re: [PATCH] Document from line in patch format

Tony wrote:
> > +    listed in the last "Signed-off-by:" line in the message when Linus
>                      ^^^^ 
> Shouldn't this be the first?

When I sent a patch with no "from" line, and two "Signed-off-by"
lines (the patch that prompted this excursion into documentation
excellence) Linus stated that the patch author ended up coming from
the second "Signed-off-by" line.

Perhaps it "should" be the first (actually - I tend to agree),
but it seems that it "is" the last.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Document from line in patch format
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Document from line in patch format
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Document from line in patch format
    • From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Ok to change cpuset flags for sched domains? (was [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER ...)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nvidiafb: PPC & mode setting fixes (#2)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document from line in patch format
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document from line in patch format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]