Re: [PATCH] [MTD] kmalloc + memzero -> kzalloc conversion

On Oct 01 2005, at 11:46, Artem B. Bityutskiy was caught saying:
> On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 22:00 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> > We have the API, so use it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <[email protected]>
> > 
> Well, does it really hurt if one does kmalloc() + memset(zero) instead? Is it worth fixing this? Doubts.

I see it more as an API usage cleanup then a "fix" of any sort. 

~Deepak

-- 
Deepak Saxena - [email protected] - http://www.plexity.net

Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] [MTD] kmalloc + memzero -> kzalloc conversion
    • From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] [MTD] kmalloc + memzero -> kzalloc conversion
    • From: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] ppc32: Add new iBook 12" to PowerMac models table
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] kmalloc + memzero -> kzalloc conversion
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] kmalloc + memzero -> kzalloc conversion
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] kmalloc + memzero -> kzalloc conversion
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]