Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: fix cpu model for family 0x6

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:37:39AM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
 > Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
 > >On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > >
 > >>I applied an earlier mix of your original one and Petr's suggestions. 
 > >>Hope it's ok. 
 > >
 > >
 > >Andi I prefer to follow the SDM guidelines. Who knows if future families
 > >comeup with a different rule or use/initialize these extended model/family
 > >bits differently. I am just being paranoid.
 > 
 > And which chance is bigger - that such hypothetical processor will use
 > extended model, and your code will get incorrect answer everywhere, or
 > that such hypothetical processor will not use extended model, and your
 > code will be right?
 > 
 > >>+		if (c->x86 >= 0xf) 
 > >
 > >
 > >And also you have a typo. It should be 0x6.
 > 
 > It is intentional.  Maybe it could do BUG_ON(c->x86 < 0xf).

<complete speculation> Pentium M is family 6, so maybe this is
an indication we'll see em64t capable P-M's soon ? :)

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/