Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Patch is attached. I would like someone to look it over and challenge it. > The thing looks too complex to me, but I see no other way. Anyone? OK, so I'm not very familiar with a lot of the code affected here, but since it diddles with unusual_devs, I feel I should chime in. But I'll chime in with a question. ;) A quick look over the patch shows that there are now two kinds of unusual_dev entries: unusual_dev() and unusual_dev_fl(), where the latter is for entries that don't need to specify SC or PR (i.e., just had US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE in them). While I think that's a reasonable change, it's not clear to me why that's useful to the rest of the patch, or it's just making unusual_devs.h artificially shorter? -- Phil Dibowitz [email protected] Freeware and Technical Pages Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC drivers/usb/storage/libusual
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC drivers/usb/storage/libusual
- References:
- RFC drivers/usb/storage/libusual
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- RFC drivers/usb/storage/libusual
- Prev by Date: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 07/10] [PATCH] check connect(2) status for IPv6 UDP socket
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC drivers/usb/storage/libusual
- Next by thread: Re: RFC drivers/usb/storage/libusual
- Index(es):