Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:

Unfortunately I must confirm that it does not fix problem.  But it pointed
out to me another thing - proc_inode_cache stuff is put into caches
BEFORE this code is executed.  So if anything in mm/slab.c relies
on node_to_mask[] being valid (and if it relies on some other things
which are set this late), it probably won't work.
								Petr


On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:58:16PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.14-rc1/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.14-rc1.orig/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c	2005-09-19 17:58:10.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc1/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c	2005-09-27 01:34:20.000000000 -0700
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@
rr++; } - set_bit(0, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(0)]);
 }
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
@@ -266,9 +265,7 @@
__cpuinit void numa_add_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	/* BP is initialized elsewhere */
- if (cpu) - set_bit(cpu, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(cpu)]);
+	set_bit(cpu, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(cpu)]);
} unsigned long __init numa_free_all_bootmem(void)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux