On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 17:24 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:27:25PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Jeff, could you help us out here?
> > What exactly does uml need to get out of the calibrate delay loop?
>
> Interrupts, it's not too demanding :-)
>
> If it's not seeing VTALRM, then it will never leave the calibration loop.
>
> Try stracing it and see what it's getting.
Sorry for the late reply.
Yes, that does seem to be the problem.
Even with a current -rt (2.6.14-rc2-rt5) UML does not run. The issue is
indeed (as jeff pointed out) that VTALRM is never send. The small test
programm below illustrates this.
On a non-rt kernel it completed in 1 second.
On a -rt kernel it waits at infinitum.
Kind regards,
Peter Zijlstra
---------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <signal.h>
volatile int quit = 0;
void sig_vtalrm(int signr, siginfo_t * si, void * arg)
{
if (signr == SIGVTALRM) quit = 1;
}
int main()
{
struct itimerval ival = {{0,0}, {1, 0}};
struct sigaction sa;
sa.sa_sigaction = sig_vtalrm;
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
sa.sa_flags = 0;
sigaction(SIGVTALRM, &sa, NULL);
setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &ival, NULL);
printf("wait\n");
while (!quit) ;
printf("done\n");
}
--
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|